Sir Edward Heath WAS a paedophile, says police chief: Astonishing claim is made that the former PM is guilty of vile crimes covered up by the (un-)Establishment.
In what will likely turn into the largest pedophile bombshell in recent history, Edward Heath, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom has finally been accused by the police chief as being a pedophile. His vile crimes against children were covered up by the (un)establishment.
However this wasn’t the only thing wrong with the former Prime Minister. He also illegally annexed Britain under the directives of Foreign rule, contrary to constitutional law.
Heath knew that the alleged “common market” would turn into a European Government which would therefore surrender vital parts of our constitution to Brussles leaving our laws subservient over a period of three decades.
In December 1960, the then Lord Chancellor Lord Kilmuir wrote to Edward Heath on the implications of signing the Treaty of Rome and joining the European Communitys advising him of the treacherous steps that would take place upon entrance.
This letter was hidden for thirty years before being released in the 1990’s from the Public Records Office. It proves we DID illegally enter the European Economic Community. The fact is irrefutable.
Some of what is written in Lord Kilmuir includes:
“…if we do sign the Treaty, we shall suffer some loss of sovereignty…”
“…This is clearly an act of Treason because our Constitution allows no surrender of any part of our Constitution to a foreign power beyond the control of the Queen in parliament. This is evidenced by the convention which says: (Parliament may do many things but what it may not do is surrender any of its rights to govern unless we have been defeated in war).”
“It is a Praemunire to allow any case to be taken to a foreign court not under the control of the Sovereign. The European Court Justice or the European court of Human rights are foreign courts not under the control of our Sovereign. Praemunire is a crime akin to Treason…”
“This is illegal under the Acts of Treason 1351, the Act of Praemunire 1392, The Act of Supremacy 1559, and the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9 [. . .] No such power exists for parliament to do this.”
“This is a surrender of our Sovereignty a clear Act of Treason…”
Another document (FCO 30/1048) dated April 1971 which was released 15 years ago in 2002 after it was also hidden for thirty years, documents the extent of the illegality.
The authors, all civil servants or ministers, are very pro EU, their intent is clearly to conceal the loss of sovereignty. But they understood perfectly it would all be abolished.
In public Heath’s government all lied the treaty would not affect our sovereignty. This includes Douglas Hurd, still an active senior Conservative, who is also both a liar and a traitor, a point we put to him at the Conservative Conference in Blackpool. He assured us his connections in the legal profession would ensure he was never convicted.
Even the Bill which took us into the EEC, said: “there would be no essential surrender of sovereignty…”. This mantra, in one form or another, was repeated throughout the campaign and the debates in Parliament. So we see a Government White Paper which attempted to bury the truth. Nothing changes as we shall see.
FCO 30/1048 now sits with other documents in a public bulk file titled Shoe-horned into the EU which meticulously documents the Heath administrations Treason, Sedition and Fraud which were used to admit us to the “common market” which later flourished into the European “Union.
Here are just a few of the damning sentences:
“Increasing loss of sovereignty
The loss of external sovereignty will however increase as the Community develops, according to the intention of the preamble to the Treaty of Rome “to establish the foundations of an even closer union among the European peoples”.
Small threats to sovereignty, like Burgess, Blunt and Maclean’s selling secrets to the Russians, attract 30 year jail sentences. The penalty for actually loosing even small parts of it until 1998 was “to hang by the neck until dead.”
King Charles 1st was executed for treason that was, by comparison, relatively minor. Lord Haw Haw (“Germany Calling” – William Joyce) was hanged for treason on 3rd January 1946. His efforts on behalf of Germany were tiny by comparison with Edward Heath’s.
“Our law subservient
12. (ii) The power of the European Court to consider the extent to which a UK statute is compatible with Community Law will indirectly involve an innovation for us, as the European Court’s decisions will be binding on our courts which might then have to rule on the validity or applicability of the United Kingdom statute.”
The writ of a foreign power is not allowed under the British Constitution, which Heath was breaking.
“Predicting monetary and military union
18 …but it will be in the British interest after accession to encourage the development of the Community toward an effectively harmonised economic, fiscal and monetary system and a fairly closely coordinated and consistent foreign and defence policy. If it came to do so then essential aspects of sovereignty both internal and external would indeed increasingly be transferred to the Community itself.”
“No withdrawal, sovereignty diminished
22. Even with the most dramatic development of the Community the major member states can hardly lose the “last resort” ability to withdraw in much less than three decades. The Community’s development could produce before then a period in which the political practicability of withdrawal was doubtful. If the point should ever be reached at which inability to renounce the Treaty (and with it the degeneration of the national institutions which could opt for such a policy) was clear, then sovereignty, external, parliamentary and practical would indeed be diminished.”
After entry there would be a major responsibility on HMG and on all political parties not to exacerbate public concern by attributing unpopular measures or unfavourable economic developments to the remote and unmanageable workings of the Community.”
“Transfer of the Executive
24 (ii) The transfer of major executive responsibilities to the bureaucratic Commission in Brussels will exacerbate popular feeling of alienation from government.”
“Erosion of sovereignty
24 (v) …The more the Community is developed … the more Parliamentary sovereignty will be eroded. …The right … to withdraw will remain for a very considerable time. …The sovereignty of the State will surely remain unchallenged for this century at least.”
“The EU Bureaucracy will rule
25. The impact of entry upon sovereignty is closely related to the blurring of distinctions between domestic political and foreign affairs, to the greater political responsibility of the bureaucracy of the Community and the lack of effective democratic control. The writers understanding of the future of the EU was very correct. They wanted the bureaucracy to take over from the democracy. The loss of sovereignty was desirable for them, legally traitors working deep inside our government.”
Not only did the ‘Government’ conceal his disgusting crimes as a paedophile, they also acted in complicity with his treason, sedition and fraud.